Renegotiating Urban Memories in the European Periphery

the Case of Kaunas as a Laboratory




architecture, collective memory, cultural identity, heritage, urban space


Three decades have now passed since Lithuania declared its independence from the Soviet Union. Following the phenomenon of progressive distancing from the Communist past, the effects of post-Soviet transition are nowadays visible in the changing urban landscape understood as the bearer of memory. The city of Kaunas (Lithuania) is used here as case study as it looks forward to move away from the “temporary capital” label and play the role of European capital of culture in 2022. The main objective of this study is to explore how Kaunas’ urban transformation affects the collective memory of the local population and in turn shapes the cultural identity of the city. Based on original survey data, this study finds that even though multiple cultural identities can coexist, there is evidence to believe that the local youth is still divided about the city’s historical legacy of the 20th century. Finally, this article marks a step in the direction of integrating the study of urban areas into the discussion about historical memory and conflicting interpretations of the past.


Aleksandravičius E., Post-Communist Transition: The Case of Two Lithuanian Capital Cities, “International Review of Sociology — Revue Internationale de Sociologie” 2006, Vol. 16, No. 2.

Baločkaitė R., The New Culture Wars in Lithuania: Trouble with the Soviet Heritage, Jena 2015.

Benjamin W., Gesammelte Schriften. Band V. Das Passagen-Werk, Frankfurt am Main 1982.

Briedis L., Vilnius: City of Strangers, CEU Press 2009.

Crinson M., Urban Memory — an Introduction, [in:] “Urban Memory: History and Amnesia in the Modern City”, ed. M. Crinson, New York 2005.

Czepczynski M., Cultural Landscapes of Post-Socialist Cities Representation of Powers and Needs, University of Gdansk 2008.

Drėmaitė M., Architecture of Optimism: the Kaunas Phenomenon, 1918–1940, Vilnius 2018.

European Parliament, Establishing a European Union Action for the European Heritage Label. Official Journal of the European Union L 303, Decision No. 1194/2011/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council dated 16 November 2011.

Fantoni E., The interpretation of the Soviet past of Kaunas in its post-socialist urban identity: promotion of the interwar period’s architecture and western influences, Bologna 2019.

Gibson C., History, Memory, and Urban Symbolic Geographies: Recent Contributions to the Historiography of Vilnius, Review article, “Acta Slavica Iaponica” 2017, Vol. 38, Hokkaido University.

Huyssen A., Present Pasts: Urban Palimpsests and the Politics of Memory, Stanford 2003.

Lähdesmäki T., Thomas S., Zhu Y., Politics of Scale: New Directions in Critical Heritage Studies, New York 2019.

Lotman J., Uspensky B., Mihaychuk G., On the semiotic mechanism of culture, “New Literary History” 1978, Vol. 9, No. 2.

Nora P., Les Lieux de Mémoire, 7 vols, Paris 1984–1992.

Petrulis V., Conflicts of Heritage: Mapping Values of Immovable Cultural Heritage in Kaunas Downtown Area, “Art History & Criticism” 2016, Vol. 12, Kaunas University of Technology.

Petrulis V., Manifestations of Politics in Lithuanian Architecture: Examples of Architectural Dehumanisation during the Transition from a Soviet to a Post-Soviet Society, “Meno istorija ir kritika” 2007, No. 3, Kaunas.

Ribelytė-Knistautienė R., Kamičaityte-Virbašienė J., Subjective Identity of Kaunas Cityscape: Research Results and Their Relation with Objective Indicators of Urban Structure, “Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering” 2016, Vol. 4.

Rossi A., The Architecture of the City, Chicago 1982.

Tunbridge J.E., Ashworth G.J., Dissonant heritage. The management of the past as a resource in conflict, Chichester 1996.

Viejo-Rose D., Cultural heritage and memory: untangling the ties that bind, “Culture & History Digital Journal” 2015, Vol. 4, No. 2.




How to Cite

Urbinati, M. (2021). Renegotiating Urban Memories in the European Periphery: the Case of Kaunas as a Laboratory. Review of Institute of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, 1, 65–78.